The Gordon gamble more fragile than expected
When Philadelphia re-signed Eric Gordon, it was widely viewed as a low-risk, veteran-friendly move that could pay dividends in leadership and shooting floor spacing. Gordon had opted out of his $3.4 million player option to explore the market, but mutual interest reportedly remained, allowing the Sixers to re-sign him at a lower cap hit (about $2.3 million pro-rated) under the veteran’s minimum structure.
In theory, that seemed a smart approach: get a known veteran shooter on a friendlier cap basis, retain depth, and maintain flexibility.
But the execution so far has been shaky:
Gordon’s tenure in Philadelphia has been plagued by injury. He underwent arthroscopic surgery on his right wrist last February, sidelining him for at least three months and effectively ending his season.
Before the surgery, he had already been in and out of the rotation, moving from starter to bench, then back again.
His production has been modest. In 39 games (13 starts), Gordon averaged 6.8 points, 1.2 rebounds, and 1.7 assists in about 19.7 minutes per game.
While his 3-point percentage (40.9%) last season is eye-catching, it came on limited volume, and over a small sample size; there’s skepticism about how sustainable it is—especially given wear and tear, injury risk, and reduced mobility with age.
In short: Gordon’s reunion isn’t yielding the on-court stability or impact the 76ers likely hoped for, and his health risk is nontrivial. The question is: how much patience does the front office have?
—
Why Philly might push for a “top” free agent now
Given the Gordon situation, the 76ers may be increasingly pressured (internally and externally) to pursue a more substantial upgrade. Here are core motivations for that push:
1. Guard / wing depth is not assured
Philadelphia already has a crowded backcourt mix — Tyrese Maxey, Quentin Grimes (newly retained) , rookie VJ Edgecombe, and others. But not all of these players are established shooters or reliable veterans. If Gordon’s health or consistency fails, the team will want insurance: someone with proven scoring, two-way ability, or playoff-level poise to slot into wing or guard roles immediately.
2. The “ceiling or bust” mindset for contention
The 76ers have signaled they believe their window is open — with Joel Embiid, Paul George, Maxey, and a cast of supporting pieces. To honor that ambition, they likely feel they must swing for more rather than settle for stopgaps. If a high-caliber free agent becomes available, passing on it in favor of a shaky veteran deal could be seen as lacking conviction.
3. Market dynamics and competition
Other clubs will be in the chase for impact players, particularly wings or two-way guards. Waiting too long or relying on bargain veterans like Gordon could leave Philadelphia behind in the bidding or forced into overpaying later. Acting decisively now, leveraging cap flexibility or trades, might yield better value and avoid regret.
4. Insurance against injuries and fatigue
In the modern NBA, load management, injuries, and late-season fatigue are constants. Teams often lose valuable contributors down the stretch or in playoffs. The 76ers might want to ensure they have enough wings/guards capable of contributing, even if Gordon is unavailable or limited.
—
Who might they target — and what’s realistic
“Top free agent” is a broad label; it could range from a high-end starter-tier wing to a borderline star. Some plausible targets or directions include:
Veterans with two-way prowess — Someone like Mikal Bridges, Khris Middleton (if available), or a wing who can defend and knock down open shots.
Younger two-way guards/wings — Players in their mid-20s with upside who might prefer joining a contender rather than settling for a mid-tier team.
High-level shooters — Given Gordon’s shooting use case, the 76ers might specifically seek backcourt shooters (3-and-D types) who can stretch the floor more reliably.
Realistically, the 76ers won’t land a max-level star unless they package significant assets. Instead, they may pursue a secondary star or high-end complementary player. The front office might use trade assets, leverage expiring contracts, or explore creative sign-and-trade or sign-and-waive mechanisms to make salary fit.
—
Risks and challenges
Pursuing a top free agent under this narrative is not risk-free. The 76ers management will need to grapple with:
Cap constraints — Even with Gordon’s reduced cap hit, splurging on a “big” free agent may require shedding salary or assets.
Fit and chemistry — Integrating a new star or high-usage player into the rotation around Embiid, George, Maxey, and existing wings requires care. Missteps could disrupt harmony.
Health risk — Just as Gordon’s body becomes a wild card, any new signing has durability risks, especially if they’ve had prior injuries.
Expectation pressure — With elevated investment comes greater expectations. The margin for error shrinks, and internal patience may well be shorter.
—
Possible narrative outcomes
If the 76ers do strike for a top free agent:
It could signal the organization truly believes the current core is championship-ready and is willing to take bold steps to boost the margin.
Gordon’s role might shrink further — he would shift more to mentorship, situational shooting stints, or limited minutes in specific packages.
The move might push Philadelphia closer to a “win-now” posture, amplifying scrutiny — but also increasing their upside if the gamble pays off.
If they don’t make a marquee signing:
It could reflect caution or acknowledgment that Gordon’s return, though flawed, is as much as they can confidently bank on.
The 76ers would have to bet heavily on development — hoping Edgecombe, Grimes, or other young wings step up.
Alternatively, they might target mid-tier veterans or trades — less ideal, but less risky.
—
In summary: the Gordon reunion may have been intended as a low-cost, stabilizing move, but it’s showing signs of instability. That opens a window — perhaps a narrow one — for Philadelphia to pursue a higher-end free agent. Doing so would reflect both urgency and ambition, but also brings cap, fit, and risk challenges. Whether the 76ers act or not will reveal a lot about their confidence in their core, their front-office appetite for boldness, and how badly they believe the Gordon approach has failed.
Leave a Reply